Who doesn't love Javier Zanetti?

By its fundamentals, FIFA 23 Coins Ultimate Team is about developing a squad that is complete and utterly unique to their style and every gamer. From formations, to kits, to managers, to gamers, to the respective style of play featured by each gamer -- FUT is all about customisation. Now, while gamers are able to use one of the various in-game kits because their home or away strip, to provide an even more all-encompassing awareness of customisation, a natural step would be for players to be able to design their own personal kits.

Some of the kits designed by music arts for recent Ultimate Team offerings are completely and utterly horrendous to be blunt. Just take a peek at a few of the kits shown in the corresponding picture? Surely gamers should be allowed control to conjure up their own personal unique apparel in order to add one sense of individuality, if that's the bar of acceptability. Maybe we'll eventually put a stop to opponents turning up in that tuxedo kit that is garish.

Who doesn't love Javier Zanetti? However, as much as so many of us have such fond memories of the mythical Inter Milan star, it seems like the Icons are mildly tweaked with every edition of FIFA. Granted, from a company standpoint, EA Sports is not likely to just give players all of their favorite legends at the same time - the idea being to drip-feed in a few new names with every continued release -- yet it is perhaps the ideal time to start sacrificing some of the principles of the last few releases if it means someone like the energetic Cafu becomes a right-back choice in place of Zanetti.

The Icons element of FUT is obviously enjoyable if you are in a position to pick up one of these famed figures of the past, yet there continue to be plentiful of stars who gamers are dying to receive their hands on. For more about this, of course, we just so happened to have already put together a list of ten such legends who are ripe for a FIFA 23 appearance.Over the past few versions of FIFA Ultimate Team -- much like other paywall-structured games -- these gamers with more real life money at their disposal've experienced a major advantage in regards to having the ability to afford the ludicrous price tags put on Icons and IF players.

There are always going to be that's the nature of getting Icons and IF cards but there needs to be a sensible cap on the costs currently placed on these gamers. When you see the FUT transfer market comprising players being bought for almost 3 million coins, that's absolutely ridiculous. Ironically, which FUT director has that number of coins in their disposal unless they're investing a amount of the real money into the game?

In terms of what a price cap could be, 1 million coins appears like the right type of figure. That's a cost that is initially for the casual gamer out of reach, however not impossibly out of reach. After all, it's only right that you need to earn those Icons and IF gamers, however there must be that light in the tunnel where you can realistically make these stars added to your team if you put the job in.For the advantage of those that dab their real cash on FUT packs, it would be wise of EA Sports to implement a limitation on the number of packs each player can buy on a weekly or daily basis.

There are various stories out there of people getting addicted to FUT packs, to the extent -- in certain events -- where people have put themselves in trouble. By restricting the number of packs someone can buy a week, that could serve to both put a limit on those who may have issues with their self-control and level the playing field amongst gamers. Surethis is probably never going to take place, for EA makes a huge amount of money from players buying more and packs because they chase the delight of trying to unpack bigger and better star names for their squad. However, if to looking after its own players, restricting the number of packs that somebody can buy cheapest FUT 23 Coins could somehow look past their own gain and move their focus is an addition that may be of a benefit.